Democracy! Voting rights for every person! Right?

'Voting rights for everyone, that's true democracy!' 'Except of course for women, people of colour, slaves, people who are not rich and people under the age of 18.' 'Of course. That goes without saying.'

Fun times that must have been, at the start of modern 'democracy'. At least for rich, white dudes.

It took mankind some 2000 years to further evolve because rich, white dudes are not known for being quick to adopt new ideas. Or give up even an ounce of power.

Want to read (more of) my short stories? My author page: Terrence Weijnschenk at Amazon

A donation (click) is much appreciated:

==============

Even a 'progressive' club like the Freemasons took a while to see women as 'people'. Although the first Freemason Lodges that allowed women were formed some hundred years before the first country gave women the right to vote in national elections. And there are still men only-Lodges to this day. On the other hand: there are also women only-Lodges. So there's that. But are there societies (or have there ever been) were only women are allowed to vote?

In quite a few countries it's still men who decide what a woman can do with her body. And while in most countries the old idea that women are not capable of making decisions is being pushed out of society, in 'the land of the free!', the USA, there's a backwards tendency going: more and more States are banning abortion. In Idaho (click) accidentally getting pregnant could land a young woman in jail: she is not allowed to get pregnant ánd is not allowed an abortion. Good luck preventing 15-17 olds from having sex. So maybe it's a really stupid idea to ban sex-education in schools.

In many cultures children have a say in how things go - if even in their own household - and just look at your own family tree: you'll notice your great-grandmother may have become a mother for the first time before she was even sixteen. But should 15-years old teens have the right to vote or become a parent? Always an interesting discussion, even as just a thought-experiment. By extension: should anyone have to perform some test before they foster children or vote? Or should society allow people who have absolutely no understanding of what it entails to become a parent or vote? And how do we decide who is capable and not?

In too many countries a person can't be homosexual, transgender or in some other way not a heterosexual part of the majority without being scolded or even left out of society.

Unless they are a Republican politician of course. D'oh!

Homosexual and transgender people are a minority in society. Should other people bow to a minority? A valid question:

I for one hope we don't have to wait a couple of hundred years to arrive in the world of Star Trek. In which every single individual is seen as valuable. A world in which gender, gender identity, sexual attraction or lack thereof, skin colour, age, religion or colour of skin, mental of physical handicap does not matter anymore. But just the way you are as a human being.

Would you like such a world? If you fear a world in which everyone is considered equal, not just people who look and act like you, may I ask why?

Her eyes (a #shortstory or #poem)

"We have the power, the will, the money and the knowledge to turn Mars into Earth as it was through geo engineering.

It takes less money and effort to turn Earth into how it was

so why don't we try that?"

I was unable to reply

as I was struck by the fire

in her eyes.

Want to read (more of) my short stories? My author page: Terrence Weijnschenk at Amazon

A donation (click) is much appreciated:

Of all cops, the ones in the USA are the most violent

Here's an article (click) explaining why US police officers are far more 'trigger happy' than police in other rich (wanted to say 'civilised' but decided not to) countries. A quote:

"...communication skills are largely ignored by most police academies.

This is why you see officers very rapidly escalating from initial communication to the actual physical use of force, because this is how they train."

Unfortunately, most US police officers seem to think that Muslims and people of colour form a bigger threat than 'decent, white, christian folk'. I'm really sorry for the Americans reading this but I have to burst your bubble: the data says that you are very wrong and had yourself lied to by a couple of populists, paid by a few big companies. 

Do you really think that most mass shootings in the USA are performed my muslims, homosexuals, transgenders or people of colour? If you still believe that after seeing these stats, you are not only gullible but also very, very stupid.

Why do you think US cops have such a bad reputation? Or 'rep' as Americans seem to like to abbreviate that word to.

Want to read (more of) my short stories? My author page: Terrence Weijnschenk at Amazon

A donation (click) is much appreciated: