Final Solution

"When will the UN finally intervene!" "As soon as the IOF starts killing UN workers. The intentional murder of tens of thousands of innocents is absolutely no reason for the UN to [upset our boss] do anything." 

"But they just killed over 200 of your staff!" 

"Well, yes, but that's merely a fact and absolutely no reason to stand in the way of the z!o's wish for a Thousand Year Empire and more Lebensraum with their Blut und Boden policy so we still support their Final Solution."

Fact is: the UN is absolutely powerless if only one memberstate veto's a UN decision. In the case of the Israel/Palestine conflict, the [z!onists] US has used its veto rights over 30 times.

If the UN was a democratic organ, the UN would have long ago intervened in the conflicts in Ukraine and Gaza. But truth is: the UN appears to be controlled by those who have everything to gain by armed conflicts.

========================

Want to read (more of) my short stories? My author page: Terrence Weijnschenk at Amazon

A donation (click) is much appreciated:

Are Americans brainwashed?

This American couple seems to be pretty sure they were brainwashed. 

But got deprogrammed when they moved to Europe. Specifically France. They started to question the concept of 'Freedom'. The US version versus that of actual democracies. In the US most people who want 'Freedom!' want the freedom to be free from consequences, to do as they please.

This couple puts in a a broader perspective: "Americans want 'the freedom to...(carry guns, buy a bigger car, be r4cist 4ssholes), while Europeans want 'the freedom from...(bigots, dictators, dependency on money). 

Generally speaking: Americans want their freedoms to trump (...) those of others, while Europeans strive for everyone to feel free.

Example: Europeans want affordable healthcare for all, while (millions. But not all) Americans only care about themselves:

After watching this video (https://buff.ly/3OaUDwu) and based on what you already knew, would you rather live in the USA or in a democratic country in Europe? 

==================================

Want to read (more of) my short stories? My author page: Terrence Weijnschenk at Amazon

A donation (click) is much appreciated:

Barbarians!

The term 'barbarian' was a word the ancient Greeks used for anyone who didn't speak Greek and were apparently therefore uneducated lowlives. 'Foreigners' in a broader sense. The word would later be used by Arab conquerors refering to the indigenous people of North Africa, mainly the Berbers. And no, that name is not etymologically connected to 'barbarians'. 

If you're done with Tik Tok and Netflix for the day and therefore have a few minutes to spare, here's a very interesting piece on the subject. 

In Dutch it's called a 'Geuzennaam'. 'Geuzen' being the name the Spanish oppressors gave the Dutch resistance a couple of centuries ago was supposed to be derogative but they started proudly calling themselves Geuzen. Derived by the Spanish from the French word 'gueux' for 'lowlifes, scum, filthy beggars'. In short. 

To defy the Spanish the Dutch stole their recipe fot bitterballen (that's not a joke but true. Bigly) and started wearing the given nickname as a batch of honour.

The Spanish got their asses kicked at Haarlem by a group of women lead by a woman called Kenau after all the men had fled from town and even the Dutch army at the time refused to come to the aide of Haarlem. 'Kenau' is now a derogative word used for strong, independent women who won't listen to their fathers and husbands. And some women use it as a badge of honour.

The nazis used the word 'Untermensch' to refer to people who were less 'genetically perfect' than the Arian race. Which I still find odd as the nazi's hated people whose skin colour was darker than that of H!tler. The Arian people were basically from India. 

But no homosexual, Jew, communist, union member, Freemason, handicapped person or gypsy ever proudly called their own people 'Untermensch'. 

It seems not every derogative term is used as a 'Geuzennaam' (badge of honour). 

Can you think of other groups of people who started proudly calling themselves the name an oppressive force used to dehumanize them?

Interesting little known fact: the French started calling the Arabs (just like 'the west' a very broad term) 'Oriental Semites'; everyone speaking a semitic language is a semite. Jews, Ethiopians and Arabs alike. Making everyone who hates Jews, Ethiopians and/or Arabs an antisemite. Just so you know.

=================================

Want to read (more of) my short stories? My author page: Terrence Weijnschenk at Amazon

A donation (click) is much appreciated:

Living outside society

Perhaps it's time for an actual, good old fashioned 'revolution of the people'. To get people in power who actually know what it's like to be 'the people'. 

A revolution does not always have to be violent; there are many ways to protest tyranny. Like this one:

People like President Trump and former British Prime Minister Rishi Sunak are absolutely [useless] clueless about actual life outside their palaces.

They actually seem to think every single millionair is a decent person "because they have a lot of money, just like we do." Latest evidence for this rather silly idea: Krasnov introduced 'the Gold card'; a 'green card' for millionaires. Everyone who gives him 5 million dollars gets to enter the USA. Even if they're rapists, frauds and human traffickers. That it's illegal to simply sell immigration papers, does not matter to tyrants. My apologies to wappies: the article in question contains a lot of words. Some even have three syllables or more. 

From their privileged position 'the elite' think not having Sky Channel as a kid is considered 'hardship' (Sunak) or that it's normal to state you dislike nepotism but give your son-in-law a job in your government. Like Trump did. Just like he thinks it's normal to want to frack your own daughter and let her sleep in the White House instead of your wife.

Wappies like to defend their Great Leader's ('Führer' in German) behaviour with: "Yeah, but Biden once sniffed a girl's hair and his son got business deals, just because of his last name!" As if Trump's children didn't. 

If your country gets new 'management' and you personally could choose, would you go for a multimillionaire despote who has already proven he would mainly enrich himself and his family and business partners (despotes never have actual friends), a highly educated person who might mean well but is actually out of touch with society and reality or someone else entirely?

Would you yourself make a great President? Why?

Think about it with your country's next elections.

=============================

Want to read (more of) my short stories? My author page: Terrence Weijnschenk at Amazon

A donation (click) is much appreciated:

Are tourists stupid?

"Karen's mad they speak Spanish in Spain":  https://buff.ly/3UI17Xd

I have this theory: as soon as people are tourists, their IQ drops some 30 points.

Why do you think so many tourists are really stupid?

The question 'How stupid can you get?" tourists consider a challenge.

====================================

Want to read (more of) my short stories? My author page: Terrence Weijnschenk at Amazon

A donation (click) is much appreciated:

===================================

When people are on vacation abroad, they often leave their thinking cap at home:

They wonder why Spanish people speak Spanish, why their favourite local cookie is not available a thousand miles away and forget how to be polite. 

I find it hard to believe but witnessed it myself more than once: often tourists don't know that the international 'Do not Enter!' sign means exactly the same in other countries as it does in their own.

"How was I supposed to know I wasn't allowed to enter?" "What do you think that sign says?" "In my country it means "Do not Enter" but I don't know what it means in this country." 

When you vacation abroad, do you leave your thinking skills at home or do you realize not thinking and not respecting local habits can be actually dangerous?

Only cash!

If a wappie tells you they only pay in cash, you know one thing for sure: they're lying. Or do you think there are many people who report at Netflix HQ once a month to pay their subscription in cash?

Wappies state they are against CBDC because their favourite populists blew a dog whistle but don't even know what the letters stand for. Or that their hero Putin is a big fan and is introducing CBDC in Russia. 

In short: wappies don't care what their favourite fascists want; they only vote for them because they too are mysoginist, homophobic 4ssholes.

Want to read (more of) my short stories? My author page: Terrence Weijnschenk at Amazon

A donation (click) is much appreciated:

Were the nazis socialists?

One of the most popular talking points at the 'radical right' (calling people who tick all the boxes' of f4scism 'f4scists' makes those poor babies cry) is: 'The N4zis were socialists!'

A claim that has been thoroughly debunked over and over. But n4zis... sorry...the 'radical right' won't hear of it. Instead they repeat the soundbites from their favourite Great Leader ('Führer' in German) and say stupid things like: "Yeah, but 'nazi' means 'national socialism' so they say it themselves!"

They say more stupid stuff of course but here's one of my favourites:

I asked him: "If your Great Leader really loved communists, why was that group the first to be rounded up and put in concentration camps?" 

He has yet to answer. Which makes sense: 'radical right' people simply repeat the soundbites of their Great Leader and are uncapable of answering a simple question about their false claims. 

One of this 'radical right' person's recurring dogmas is this one:

"The nazi's came with a 'car for the people' and worker's rights. Socialist ideas. That means the nazi's were left."

This was my response:

It's almost like you mean it when you write that anyone with a 'socialist' idea is a socialist. You're stating that anyone who is in favour of worker's rights is a socialist. So either you are a socialist yourself ór you think workers should not have rights. 🤭

And yes, WaPo is centre left. Which doesn't mean that the facts they present are not facts. Not even when those facts are not in line with the worldview of people called Erik. 😉

The popular 'radical right' talking point that the nazi's were socialist has been thoroughly debunked, over and over. 

https://www.britannica.com/story/were-the-nazis-socialists

Sorry to burst your bubble. 

One of the 'arguments' that r4cists use is: "I don't hate black people". 

N4zis and slave owners hated people who were not like them. Just like nowadays those known as the 'radical right'.

Maybe 'hate' is a strong word and they simply can't understand people being different from them. Anyone in favour of equal rights is scary to them. It's why fans of f4scism hate 'woke'

and 'antifa'

It's why they call anyone who is not a dumbright wappie 'left'. Because 'left' is the ultimate horror for them. To them every source that doesn't spread fake, often r4cist information, is 'left'. 

It explains why wappies see Elon Musk as 'right'. Which leads to them adoring a billionaire with political influence and hating a billionaire with political influence. 

They cried en masse when their Great Leader was accused of bringing the n4zi salute:

"Elon did not bring the n4zi salute and the left did it too!", the dumbright cried. Proving they're really dumb. "Yes, my Great Leader brought the n4zi salute but other did it too!" really isn't the best defense.

"It was simply a slightly awkward hand gesture expressing his love to his followers and Elon is a bit autistic so didn't know what it could mean. And he's an African so grew up without knowledge of the H0locaust 'n stuff!"

Wappies were frantically trying to make excuses for their Great Leader's behaviour. Adoring, really, that kind of blind worship. So I challenged a few fans of f4scism: "If Elon's arm gesture really was as innocent as you claim, I dare you to make that same gesture at your local H0locaust museum."

For wappies the WEF is left, George Soros is left and the Washington Post is left. Basically, instead of saying 'left', wappies might as well say: 'I'm terrified of facts'. 

And yes, I know their knee jerk reaction now is: "You can't trust that source because they are left!" but that's not a valid argument. Like I stated above: facts are facts, even if you don't want them to be.

========================

Want to read (more of) my short stories? My author page: Terrence Weijnschenk at Amazon

A donation (click) is much appreciated:

=================

The radical right - in general - has difficulty with comprehensive reading so to accommodate them, I sometimes turn my replies into easily understandable memes:

Why do you think the 'radical right' loves flawed logic and hates facts?

What are the arguments of stupid people?

"Yeah, but I don't know what's exactly in it!" as an argument for an anti-covid vaccine is laughable. Do those people know exactly what's in a whiskey bottle, in their cigarette? In a box of cereals? In that gram of the white, powdery stuff they bought from a complete stranger in a club last weekend of which they know it was transported in a condom through a foreigner's gut? 

"They inject you with nano-particles!" Yes and no. 'Nano' simply means 'really, really small' and yes, H²0 and other liquids contain really, really small particles. But no nanobots. Sorry.

"Everybody who takes the jab, will die within two months!" Within two months of what? Because if you are speaking of 'two months within taking an anti-covid vaccine', how do you explain that most who got it are still alive years later?

"They put a tracker in you to follow you for the rest of your life!" See above point: why would 'they' want to follow you for two months?

The way that wappies 'reason' is usually only laughable. "This chemist is a scientist who never studied the climate so he knows more about climate change than climate scientists!" falls into the same category as: "Max Verstappen is one of the best race drivers. Thus, because he's an expert, he knows more about baking pancakes than the chef of the Pancake House!"

If you're an expert in a certain field does that imply you know everything about everything else? Wappies seem to think so.

=========================

Want to read (more of) my short stories? My author page: Terrence Weijnschenk at Amazon

A donation (click) is much appreciated:

=============================

"What!? People knew the Earth was a globe before there were pictures of it!?" 

People who can't critically think are surprised to find out others - even centuries ago - can. And to them only pictures can provide scientific evidence. It's sad, really.

Do you think critically thinking can be taught or are some born with the skill and other will never learn?

Are all fundamentalists stupid?

Religion can give people hope and strength. Something to hold on to when everything seems to fall apart. And that's nice.

It could be the believe in a goddess of the trees, a god of the river, an animal spirit, one of the current traditional gods like Allah, Jahweh or, you know, God. But also the believe you own something that's the best ever because it has a silver apple on it, can comfort people.

Nothing wrong with that. But there ís something wrong with religious zealots: they are stupid.

Like this one:

Can you see what's wrong with this statement? Please say you do.

=====================

Want to read (more of) my short stories? My author page: Terrence Weijnschenk at Amazon

A donation (click) is much appreciated:

====================

It's okay to believe and it's okay to be stupid. 

Faith only becomes dangerous when it drives people too far and they become fundamentalists, easily steered by people who don't mean well. Not for the human race, anyway. They just want more money and power for a small group: themselves and their closest minions. 

So demagogues turned faiths and believes into religions and the flock started to kill eachother over land and camels. Camels? Yes, camels.

From the R¡ver to the S3a

Have decided to write a book in which a Higher Being promises Iceland to my offspring. So in 3.000 years from now, my offspring (and millions who claim to be), 

can legally murder Icelanders and occupy their homes. 

Sounds rather silly, right? And a bit frightening: legally killing tens of thousands of children based on a probably non-existing, 3.000 years old promise? 

But it's exactly why millions are being displaced and even murdered. 

Or is there some other reason why z¡onists want all the land that stretches from the R¡ver to the S3a? 

In the same Bible in which God promised the Promised Land to the offspring of Abraham (so yeah, He also promised the Holy Land to the Muslims), He attached a few demands.

Interesting sidenote: Abraham lived - some 1000 years apart from Ötzi the Iceman - in the Bronze Age.

The Israelites did not keep their promise to God but still demand Him to keep His part of the deal.

Why did they need the Allies after WW2 to put them on transport to the Middle East? Couldn't their all powerful God give them Isra-el?

Z¡onists 'accidentally' forget to [indoctrinate] teach their children it clearly states the land was promised to all descendants of Abraham, not just to the followers of Judaism, the J3ws. 

Luckily some escape the mind control of z¡onist rabbis. But it's a rare occurrence. 

Would you willingly give up your home if someone showed you a 3.000 years old piece of paper that stated some self invented Higher Being promised them the land you live on?

Want to read (more of) my short stories? My author page: Terrence Weijnschenk at Amazon

A donation (click) is much appreciated:

I demand the right to be stupid!

After almost a year in control, the first Dutch fasc.. pardon me... radical right government, fulfilled exactly one (1) of the dozens of promises that made 25% of the population vote them in:

Being allowed to drive at a speed of 130kph! Yeah!

Few remarks: 130kph already was the speed limit on certain roads and on certain times of day. Making the new law cost the tax payer tens of thousands of euros, months of meetings by hundreds of people who couldn't do anything useful and would probably lead to more accidents.

'Yeah, but it increased the stretches of road where I can drive 130kph!' True. By 26 kilometres. Happy now you get to pay more taxes because the new Dutch government added a stretch of 26 kilometres where you can drive 130kph?

While it will be interesting to find out what the next big change is that is caused by [stupid, selfish idiots] the [f4scist] new Dutch government, here's why it's stupid to just drive faster, not smarter. Explained by Not Just Bikes:

The Dutch 'radical right' (f4scists start crying for their mommy if you call them f4scists. Those poor snowflakes) loves their US counterpart. Because they are just as dumb and simplistic as other dumbright people. Take this absurd plan to turn the USA into Gilead, 'Project 2025'. You know, which TFG stated he didn't know anything about.

"How will you cut government spending according to this great plan of yours, a few hundred of you have thought about for years?"

"To cut government spending, we will cut government spending."

I'm sorry America, but your new leaders are ignorant, stupid, r4cist toddlers.

=======

Want to read (more of) my short stories? My author page: Terrence Weijnschenk at Amazon

A donation (click) is much appreciated:

What is 'honest reporting'?

A young woman killed herself on her 22nd birthday. 

And can therefore be added to the list of people killed at the Nova Festival in Israel on October 7th 2023. The reporter writing about this tragic loss accidentally left out a few details in his article. Or her. 

Because the reporter knows they're a biased liar (the woman most likely took her own life because she suffered from PTSD. That's - unfortunately - true. That 1200 people were killed at the Nova Music Festival is not) and therefore won't share their name.

Tip: if you consider believing what's in an article but it's signed with 'the editor', a pen name or not at all, you know the writer knows he or she is lying.

Very common with right wing 'information' sources. Like media outlet I24. And millions of gullible, prejudiced and stupid people fall for fake news and demagogues using a certain type of words to get 'the people' riled up.

Wappies lack critical thinking skills so are easily steered with persuasive writing. Demagogues use loaded words to provoke a desired emotion. It's why some thirty percent of all people gets angry at hearing the word 'foreigners' and variations on the theme like 'witches' (okay, maybe not anymore), 'communists', 'refugees', 'muslims' and 'the left'. 

H¡tler was a master in manipulating the masses and made excellent use of newspapers and the then new medium radio to his advantage. By practicing he learned that even how you say a word can make gullible people believe anything you say instantly.

Many people are suffering from PTSD after that faithful day in October 2023. And unfortunately more than a few unalive themselves because they can't handle the emotions of the aftermath anymore.

It must be awful to deliberately shoot a playing child through the back of the head from a safe distance. Or to round people up at gunpoint, have their hands tied behind their backs, make them lie down and run over them with a tank you got from US- and EU taxpayers. Why do those Untermenschen have to scream so loudly? 

Why do these poor, agressive, child murdering f4scists don't get what they deserve? 

In Dutch we say 'huilie huilie' ('cry cry cry') when referring to what Americans call 'snowflakes': people who cry over things that emotionally mature people don't really care about. Like *ssholes feeling sorry for themselves because they hurt their hand when molesting a child. Or people laughing about refugees being blown apart but are crying because they sometimes can't sleep because of the sounds of sirens in the distance. Or child r4pists complaining about nightmares involving crying children.

A few years ago the term got hijacked by a Dutch immigrant-turned-f4scist to demean people who he and his fellow f4scists mean to strip of their human rights. 

What term do you use to describe crying, f4scist snowflakes?

Now CNN has declared itself an ally of a f4scist regime, is it still considered 'lying MSM!' by f4scists?

===========

Want to read (more of) my short stories? My author page: Terrence Weijnschenk at Amazon

A donation (click) is much appreciated:

"I came out as trans"

A conservative TV personality, Josh Seiter, came out as trans. Predictably, from the right he got nothing but hateful and plain dumb reactions. The left - generally - could not be bothered, except for the odd: "Congratulations on your coming out!"

"As I predicted and now have proven: my side of the lane, the right, is full of intolerant, dumb a-holes and the left doesn't care about someone's gender and is usually supportive and empathic. I really called out the left, haven't I? Ha!" ~some right wing nutjob most don't know.

I don't care that this nobody came out as a lying, conservative, idiot. Why can't he and his fellow stupid people sleep at the thought that someone they don't know once identified with a different sexe?

"Everybody should be totally free to decide for themselves! But only if they call themselves 'christian' and are dumb hypocrites. Apparently. 

Conservatives are só dumb that they can't think of laws banning guns, but they càn conjur up laws taking away people's personal choices.

Conservatives are só dumb that they think that children will turn into little dictators when you teach them about Hitler and Stalin.

The real question should be: are conservatis só extremely dumb that you can't call them examples of the Homo Sapiens Sapiens but are conservatives an entirely different species, the Homo Lunatic Ludicrous?

Want to read (more of) my short stories? My author page: Terrence Weijnschenk at Amazon

A donation (click) is much appreciated:

Every accusation is a confession

No, this is not about the Israeli army acusing H4mas to use human shields while doing it themselves by having their headquarters in the middle of a densely populated urban area and by forcing P4lestinian civilians to walk in front of their shiny, US taxpayers sponsored, tanks. 

Nor is it about their wild stories about pregnant women (warning: distressing) being cut open by terrorists and they can't mention those women's names without admitting the atrocity was common practice among IOF soldiers doing that to P4lestinian women.

This piece also isn't about the right accusing the left of being grifters.

No, it's about US conservatives blaming 'the left' for the corruption of children, sexual 'weirdness' and nazi sympathies. A fine example of a Republican being and doing exactly what his kind accuse the left of, is Luitenant Governor of North Carolina, Mark Robinson. On a p0rn platform he proudly admitted to being 'a black n4zi!' and having a preference for watching 'trans porn'. He also called Martin Luther King 'a f* commie b4stard!' 

Although Republicans admire H!tler and Mark Robinson's wife literally stole girl scout cookies, Republicans still blame dragqueens, homo- and transsexuals for being bad people. 

Can you give three examples of a dragqueen stealing cookies from girl scouts or from having n4zi sympathies?

Want to read (more of) my short stories? My author page: Terrence Weijnschenk at Amazon

A donation (click) is much appreciated: