Where are the real Christians?

I know there are over 45,00 denominations of Christianiy and therefore there are many types of christians. But sometimes I wonder if the actual christian person still exists. You know, the ones that live according to Jesus' teachings and are therefore not racist bigots.

I know that there are racists and bigots in every single subcultur, from Goth culture to God culture, but Christianity tensions the crown. Which is a too literal translation of a Dutch expression meaning 'tops them all'.

A clear example is when you ask people who call themselves christians if they're pro-life.

"Of course I am, so abortion should be outlawed and all Muslims must die, even when they're just kids!"

Apparently 'pro-life christians' are simultaniously 'anti-life christians'. And not just because they refuse to address the issue of gun control.

Are pro-life christians who condone a genocide just incredibly stupid, hypocrites or - and that's what I think, really - in a cult?

===============================

Want to read (more of) my short stories? My author page: Terrence Weijnschenk at Amazon

A donation (click) is much appreciated:

======================================

I have friends in Punk and Goth culture. And they understand: when someone who says is Punk is a racist, that person is not Punk. Christians find it impossible to state that when someone who says is Christian is a racist, that person is not christian. Or so it seems.

Do you think someone could be a real Christian as well as a bigot?

The worst bigots ever in the history of the world are MAGA-christians. They literally worship a guy who depicts all Seven Major Sins all by himself and thinks The Ten Commandments are rules to live by.

Maga-christians also appear to have a completely different version of the Bible.

Apparently the verse Matthew 6:5-6 is non-existent in the Trump Bible. His flock comes out in throves to pray to Him out on the streets so everyone can see how loyal they are to their Savior, Donald J. Trump.

Even more different than the King James version, used by most other idiots...pardon me...christians, mainly in the US. Did you know a few verses used to tell: "A man should not sleep with a boy" but was changed to "A man should not sleep with another man" because church leaders at the time did not like it that King James was bi? 

Pam Bondi would say: "King James was absolutely not gay! He just liked having sex with men, you filthy antisemite communist! And why won't you admit he saved our economy?"

Scholars (for Maga-christians: people who actually studied your holy scriptures and are not in a cult) agree: the verses were originally focused on prohibiting pederasty (sex with young boys), incestuous homosexual acts, or acts connected to pagan idolatry rather than all homosexual relationships.

Why do you think that many people who call themselves christians are actually not?

Still (a #poem)

After a while

you realise

it all made sense

In a weird way

but still

Want to read (more of) my short stories? My author page: Terrence Weijnschenk at Amazon

A donation (click) is much appreciated:

The Right can't actually debate

As Pam Bondi showed us during the Epstein hearings, she can't debate. Sure, she learned a few debating tricks but isn't really good in utilising them. Perhaps Jordan Peterson can give her a few lessons. Like 'shouting doesn't help cover up a lie'. 

But maybe Jordan Peterson isn't the best teacher when it comes to debating; he loses it as soon as his conversation partner makes sure he can't use one of his debating tricks:

Just name any right winger who ever got in a debate (Ben Shapiro, Charlie Kirk...) with a sane person and a pattern emerges: right wingers have to resolve to using debating tricks because there are simply no arguments to prove their racist and misogynistic ideas.

Ben Shapiro's only debating trick is to never answer questions:

Charlie Kirk's main debating trick was the ad hominem: trying to throw his conversation partner of by throwing insults at them, hoping they would forget to talk about the subject at hand. And always lost the debate when his conversation partner saw through that:

That's why it's funny to see a right winger pushed to come up with actual arguments. Like when Jeremy Carl (racist, antisemite commentator and therefore he qualified as government official under Trump) was heard by Senator Chris Murphy (sane person) over racial discrimination:

Want to have a laugh? Ask a racist for arguments for their racist retoric and their definition of 'white culture'. 

Can you help right wingers and come up with actual arguments for racist and misogynistic views or at least give them sort of a definition of 'white culture' and why it should be preserved?

=============================

Want to read (more of) my short stories? My author page: Terrence Weijnschenk at Amazon

A donation (click) is much appreciated: