How can people claim to be pro-life and at the same time have no objections when children die in detention camps in the USA? 'Their parents shouldn't have come here illegaly!' is the most heard argument. As if they don't know seeking asylum is anything but illegal and think seperating young children from their parents is a very common practise. It is not. 'Yeah, but Obama started it!' So? That makes it less worse? Fact is: even is Obama did start it, the current President could end it if he wanted. But he won't.
But luckily there are still preachers out there who literally practise what they preach:
https://www.boredpanda.com/signs-clackamas-united-church-of-christ-milwaukie-adam-ericksen/?utm_source=google&utm_medium=organic&utm_campaign=organic
And
how can people claim to be against government intervention as well as in favour of a government telling women what to do with their bodies?
Want to read (more of) my short stories?
My author page:
Terrence Weijnschenk at Amazon
https://www.amazon.com/-/e/B00K4007NG
No comments:
Post a Comment